Sunday, December 6, 2009

Telangana...! An opportunistic politics played by Andhras and the congress

Have you people ever wondered why we are fighting for Telangana. Here I try to present a brief review of history and what has happened in the past.Lets go back to year 1950 when the state of hyderabad(Vellodi Narayana Menon was appointed as the first Chief minister of Hyderabad State on 26 January, 1950 after it was taken from Nizams in Polo Operation) was formed which is now called Telangana and Andhra( a seperate state then )which was under control of Madras.It was then in year 1953 the Telugu's started fighting for a separate state for telugu speaking locals and Poti Sriramulu came into picture.Having seen the unrest among different regional groups in India a SRC(Sates reorganization commission) was formed to create a states in India on basis of linguistic lines.

The States Reorganization Commission (SRC) was not in favour of an immediate merger of Telangana region with Andhra state, despite the common language between the two.

Para 382 of States Reorganization Commission Report (SRC) said "opinion in Andhra is overwhelmingly in favour of the larger unit, public opinion in Telangana has still to crystallize itself. Important leaders of public opinion in Andhra themselves seem to appreciate that the unification of Telangana with Andhra, though desirable, should be based on a voluntary and willing association of the people and that it is primarily for the people of Telangana to take a decision about their future". The concerns of Telanganas were numerous. The region had a less developed economy than Andhra, but with a larger revenue base (mostly because it taxed rather than prohibited alcoholic beverages), which Telanganas feared might be diverted for use in Andhra. They also feared that planned dam projects on the Krishna and Godavari rivers would not benefit Telangana proportionately even though Telanganas controlled the headwaters of the rivers. Telanganas feared too that the people of Andhra would have the advantage in jobs, particularly in government and education.

The commission proposed that the Telangana region be constituted as a separate state with a provision for unification with Andhra state, after the 1961 general elections, if a resolution could be passed in the Telangana state assembly with two-third majority.

The letter is highly significant for it reveals the thinking of Mr Burgula and his observations of the ground realities in Hyderabad state, and the impending merger of Telangana with Andhra .

Prime minister Jawaharlal Nehru ridiculed the idea of merging Telangana with the Andhra State, fearing a “tint of expansionist imperialism” in it. Later, he compared the merger to a matrimonial alliance having “provisions for divorce” if the partners in the alliance cannot get on well.

So it was a sheer opportunistic politics played by the Andhras and the congress to out rid communism in Andhra amd Telangana and have congress in power for the next 20 -30 years.

Do you think that all the 4 crore Telangana people are fools to still believe the stunts made by opportunistic politicians in Andhra? The fight in the region of Andhra is not for samaikyaandhra but for power.The one who fighths now or the most popular in colloquial terms would be the next CM for Andhra.If the Andhra's were really for united AP why didn't they raise their voice before or why were they tolerating the biased nature of politicians towards the Telangana region even when every Andhra knows that Telangana is undeveloped and needs attention.

Out of 14 lakh goverment jobs 2.5 lakh people are from Telangana(including Hyderabad which is a part of Telangana and will be a part of Telangana)when Telangana region is 43.47 % of AP.

Today Telangana region contrubutes to 45% of state revenue out of which only 24% is being spent for Telangana.Is this how polticians show regionalism?

COUNT

1.The no.of projects in Telangana?

2.The no.of educationalists and literacy rate from telangana?

3.The no.of educational institutions except for central government instituions(like NIT,IIIT,IIT etc) which has no regional quota?

4.The no.of civil servants?

5.The water share when both major rivers of AP Godavari and Krishna flow from Telangana?

The list is innumerable!

I find no wrong in KCR opportunistic and power politics.Politics is also like business.There is Telangana sentiment and he is using that for prosperity of himself and the people of Telangana.

JAI TELANGANA ! JAI JAI Telangana!



Caution : The above views and opinions are all mine and does not necessarily reflect the interest of the majority and also doesnt mean that divide and rule is the policy I would appreciate.






9 comments:

  1. I totally agree with what u r saying....jai telangana...telangana is an emergency,,,,and all politicians say that they go with majority of people decision then why are they not taking the decision of telangana ppl ...is this called samikyam taking decisions for their own personal benefits

    ReplyDelete
  2. Its the time for politicians to sit and decide about this issue rather than creating a agitation among people on the basis of regional feeling...Politicians should behave in such a way that all telugu people get benefited but most of them are supporting andhra ppl only....not for their benefits but for votes

    ReplyDelete
  3. well!!! cant a region in a state be developed without itself being made into another state. if majority of telangana people really wanted to be separate thn y didnt they continue the agitation from say abt 1960's or 70's. y did they start it all of a sudden only when a most worst opportunistic politician KCR who was not offered a minister post in 99 by Chandrababu strted a party just to support telangana so as to become a CM....

    ReplyDelete
  4. well regarding the development thing.... do u thnk the whole of andhra n rayalseema is developed???? do u knw srikakulam is on the verge of being submerged even for a slightest rainfall... dont u there is drought in rayalseema for a hell lot many times.... and regarding the revenue spent .... well let us suppose wat u said is right regarding tht telangana is givin 45% revenue and only 25%is being spent on telangana... well then think of assam or some other northeastern states in india.... the developed states of india conribute more to the indian economy but assam n other eastern states are given more share just as to develop thm... thn if u think on such lines every state or city needs to become an independent country!!!!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  5. well regarding the counts of people in civil services etc etc etc... do u want a person who delivers the work for u or do u want a regional guy or a family guy who doesnt fit into it!!!! its said that people like u still support RESERVATIONS whn AMBEDKAR only said to stop reservations after 20 yrs of its introduction....... wake up lingam!!! earn by worth not by reservation... if reservation is still encouraged thnk abt SURESHBABU before ever supporting it again!!!

    ReplyDelete
  6. This is for your first comment !! I think Ishould have gone more into history. Remind you that Telangana was merged with Andhra on Gentleman's agreement.It was breached by the same Andhra pOliticians in 1961 and the movement gained momentum in 1969 where 369 comrades scarified their life for the cause of Telangana.So it was not KCR who all of a sudden started off the movement .

    ReplyDelete
  7. This is for your second comment kamal.One should appreciate the policy being followed towards the north eastern states in spite of low revenue generated by those states.Had not the central government shown interest towards development in those states today they would have been in CHINA or a separate country would have been formed.Telangana still being undeveloped contributes to 45% of revenue.Why not spend the same 45% or more as suggested by u towards telangana when same problems persist over here as in north eastern states.Today the government has forgotrn about the considerations raised by telangana activists 50 yrs back.The government was successful in those sates to an extent to subside the movement for separate country but still there is a fight for separate country by ULFA.U might have forgotten that point...

    ReplyDelete
  8. LOl(suresh babu) Kamal for the third point mentioned by u ,u are totally out of boundary... my count for civil servants does not appeal for resevations.I tried to emphasize on literacy rate and the number of educationalists in Telangana.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Quiet Debatable dude:))
    U seem to b a hardcore Telenganite eh...there r many parts in India which r much more underdeveloped than telengana. Do u think jus by making it a separate state all problems will b resolved eh??? no guarantee eh. Don't speak abt history dude past is past. lets think abt a better future wt say??

    ReplyDelete